Skip to main content

CONGRESS IS DRIVING DOWN DISABILITY APPROVAL RATES

The US Congress is driving down Social Security disability award rates.  Congress believes that Social Security is approving too many claims.  The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has been looking into why judges have "high award rates" for claims that have already been denied twice by a field office or state disability determination agency.  The Committee's justification for forcing award rates down is that awards have increased 44 percent in the last 10 years, "pushing the trust fund to the brink of insolvency."

However, administrative law judges are supposed to review decisions made by field offices and state agencies, correct errors (and errors are many)-- and give a new decision.  It isn't like the claimant always gets a fair decision by the state agency.  In Alabama, for example, the state disability determination service (the "state agency") denies almost 80 percent of all claims.

Of course, some denials by the state agency are legitimate.  Not everyone who applies for disability benefits is eligible under the regulations.  However, we see claimants who are only able to walk with a walker, on oxygen 24/7, partially paralyzed, etc. who get denied by state agencies.  These denials should be overturn by the hearing judge.  And Congress should not interfere with legitimate administrative review of denied claims.

The basic problem is that Congress listens to a misinformed media.  Careless, biased and non-factual reporting by some of the media giants have painted Social Security disability as a program for cheats, deadbeats and frauds.  This is not true.  However, we have thrown the baby out with the bath water!  In trying to be absolutely certain that not one single undeserving person ever gets awarded, we are denying hundreds of thousands of individuals who genuinely deserve to receive the benefits they have paid for during their entire working lives. 

Congress authorized the federal disability program in July, 1956.  It made "contributions" to the disability trust fund (FICA tax) mandatory.  Workers have to pay into the program, like it or not.  If Congress wants to cut, curtail or eliminate the federal disability benefit, then members should take a vote and have their vote entered into the public record.  Of course, this they are unwilling to do because of the political consequences.  What they do instead is strong arm program decision makers to deny, deny, deny benefits.  

If you are one of the tens of thousands of Americans who is truly unable to work, hire an advocate and fight, fight, fight.  The odds are stacked against you - but with persistence, hard work (and probably a long wait) - it is still possible to get benefits.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COMPLETING THE FUNCTION REPORT FOR SOCIAL SECURITY

Social Security analyzes a new claimant's ability to perform certain activities.  This helps them to decide whether the claimant is disabled according to their rules.  They use a form called "Function Report - Form SSA-3373-BK" or one very much like it.  Be careful how you answer the questions on this form.  Strive to be accurate but also descriptive.  Try to give a real picture of how your pain or other symptoms limit your daily activities--such as shopping, driving, doing housework, socializing, etc. Here are just a few of the questions on the Function Report, as samples of the type of information being collected from each applicant who files a new claim for benefits: Do you take care of anyone else such as a wife/husband, children, parents, friend, other?  ( If you do, and do not show that you have significant problems in doing so, Social Security may judge that you are quite able to perform other activity, like working). How often do you prepare food or meals? 

JUDGE JUDY TIRADES ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY

Judge Judy Sheindlin has added her two cents worth to the controversy about Social Security.  Judge Judy appeared on a Fox News program hosted by Megan Kelly and said she was tired of people getting Social Security disability because they were "alcoholics and drug addicts," adding to the popular myth that SSDI is "going broke" because of dead beat drug users who refuse to work.  Fox News did nothing to set the record straight. The truth is that by law individuals cannot qualify for SSI or SSDI benefits based on either alcohol or drug addiction/abuse. In 1996, Congress passed Public Law ( P.L. ) 104-121—which terminated benefits for Supplemental Security Income ( SSI ) and Disability Insurance ( DI ) beneficiaries whose primary impairment was drug addiction, alcoholism, or both. As a result of the 1996 legislation, those individuals became ineligible for benefits, effective January 1, 1997. Social Security will currently not award benefits to persons becau

TAKE A HARD LOOK AT SOCIAL SECURITY BEFORE YOU FILE!

Considering a Social Security disability claim?  Take a hard look at it before deciding. If you have a choice, you probably don't need to apply. Some things to consider: 1.  It will probably not be an easy or short process.  It will take about 4 months to get your initial decision and 70% of those are denials.  If you must appeal, expect a wait time of an additional 18 months after you file the appeal.  So, you may be looking at 2 years or more in many cases. 2.  You will need good medical evidence.  If you have little or no evidence from a doctor, it isn't likely you will ever be approved. 3.  You cannot apply for SSDI while you are working and earning at least $1,170 a month.  This work will disqualify you.  Many people don't realize they will have to stop working to apply for SSDI.  That's why we say, "If you have a choice, you probably don't need to apply."  If working is an option, it's the best option. 4.  The average SSDI benefit is arou