Skip to main content

WORK EXPERIENCE IN DISABILITY CASES

Past work experience plays a major role in Social Security disability cases.  First, it is necessary to prove that the claimant cannot perform any past relevant work.  Also, it is important to determine whether the claimant has any transferable skills that were learned at past jobs.

Age in combination with education and skills will be used by vocational witnesses to determine whether a claimant is disabled.  As age increases, it becomes less likely that unskilled workers will be judged able to perform any of their past work or any other work, therefore, making a finding of "disabled" a great deal more probable than for a younger worker.

Paragraph d of Grid Rule 201.00 reads:  "the adversity of functional restrictions to sedentary work at advanced age (55 or over) - for individuals with no relevant past work or who can no longer perform vocationally relevant past work and have no transferable skills, warrants a finding of disabled in the absence of the rare situation where the individual has recently completed education which provides a basis for direct entry into skilled sedentary work."

That paragraph goes on to say, "Advanced age and a history of unskilled work or no work experience would ordinarily offset any vocational advantages that might accrue by reason of any remote past education, whether it is more or less than limited education."

When Social Security tries to make the argument that skills from one job can transfer to another job, there are rules that apply.  Particularly, paragraph f of Vocational Rule 201.00:  "In order to find trasnferability of skills to skilled sedentary work, there must be very little, if any, vocational adjustment required in terms of tools, work processes, work settings or the industry [in general]."  I added the words inside the brackets.

In the hands of a skilled disability advocate, Social Security's own rules and regulations often form the basis for approval of a claim.  This almost always happens, however, at the appeal or hearing level.  At least, that's where I most often get involved in disability claims.  I wonder if more Social Security disability claims could be approved at the initial application level if claimants would hire a representative earlier in the process.  Most claimants trudge through the application process on their own and hire a representative only after they are denied.

-------
Charles W. Forsythe is a senior advocate and founding partner with the Forsythe Firm in Huntsville, AL.  He is available to consult on Social Security disability cases in Alabama and Middle Tennessee.  His firm charges no fee except in successful cases where back pay is recovered.


About NOSSCR

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COMPLETING THE FUNCTION REPORT FOR SOCIAL SECURITY

Social Security analyzes a new claimant's ability to perform certain activities.  This helps them to decide whether the claimant is disabled according to their rules.  They use a form called "Function Report - Form SSA-3373-BK" or one very much like it.  Be careful how you answer the questions on this form.  Strive to be accurate but also descriptive.  Try to give a real picture of how your pain or other symptoms limit your daily activities--such as shopping, driving, doing housework, socializing, etc. Here are just a few of the questions on the Function Report, as samples of the type of information being collected from each applicant who files a new claim for benefits: Do you take care of anyone else such as a wife/husband, children, parents, friend, other?  ( If you do, and do not show that you have significant problems in doing so, Social Security may judge that you are quite able to perform other activity, like working). How often do you prepare food or meals? 

JUDGE JUDY TIRADES ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY

Judge Judy Sheindlin has added her two cents worth to the controversy about Social Security.  Judge Judy appeared on a Fox News program hosted by Megan Kelly and said she was tired of people getting Social Security disability because they were "alcoholics and drug addicts," adding to the popular myth that SSDI is "going broke" because of dead beat drug users who refuse to work.  Fox News did nothing to set the record straight. The truth is that by law individuals cannot qualify for SSI or SSDI benefits based on either alcohol or drug addiction/abuse. In 1996, Congress passed Public Law ( P.L. ) 104-121—which terminated benefits for Supplemental Security Income ( SSI ) and Disability Insurance ( DI ) beneficiaries whose primary impairment was drug addiction, alcoholism, or both. As a result of the 1996 legislation, those individuals became ineligible for benefits, effective January 1, 1997. Social Security will currently not award benefits to persons becau

TAKE A HARD LOOK AT SOCIAL SECURITY BEFORE YOU FILE!

Considering a Social Security disability claim?  Take a hard look at it before deciding. If you have a choice, you probably don't need to apply. Some things to consider: 1.  It will probably not be an easy or short process.  It will take about 4 months to get your initial decision and 70% of those are denials.  If you must appeal, expect a wait time of an additional 18 months after you file the appeal.  So, you may be looking at 2 years or more in many cases. 2.  You will need good medical evidence.  If you have little or no evidence from a doctor, it isn't likely you will ever be approved. 3.  You cannot apply for SSDI while you are working and earning at least $1,170 a month.  This work will disqualify you.  Many people don't realize they will have to stop working to apply for SSDI.  That's why we say, "If you have a choice, you probably don't need to apply."  If working is an option, it's the best option. 4.  The average SSDI benefit is arou