Skip to main content

MOST IMPORTANT EVIDENCE IN SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY

At a recent conference the speaker asked this thought provoking question:  "What is the most important evidence you can present at a Social Security disability hearing?"
As in a multiple choice exam, the possible answers were
  1. the claimant's medical condition
  2. the claimant's past job history
  3. the claimant's residual function capacity
  4. the claimant's vocational evidence
All of the above are certainly important.  You can't expect to win a disability hearing without proving that the claimant has a serious impairment.  The other three answers are also obviously important.  But the speaker made a convincing argument that 4, vocational evidence, is the correct choice.

He went on to say that vocational evidence is too often ignored by claimants representatives, who tend to focus strictly on medical evidence - proving that their client has this disease or that condition - when more emphasis should be placed on how the impairment affects the claimant's ability to perform on the job.

I find his argument to be basically correct.  In addition to proving that your client has a severe medically determinable impairment, you have to go a step further and show exactly how that impairment restricts the ability to perform past relevant work and all other work.  This will involve such considerations as (for examples).......
  • How long can the claimant can sit and stand at one time?
  • How many hours can the claimant sit/stand during an 8 hour work day?
  • How many pounds can the claimant lift occasionally?  Frequently?
  • How is the claimant's concentration, memory, ability to follow instructions....?
  • Are there environmental restrictions (to heat, cold, unprotected heights, dust....?)
  • What is the DOT classification of the claimant's past work?
  • Are there any transferable skills?
  • How does the claimant's age and education affect the occupational base?
The astute claimants representative must piece together a winning theory of a Social Security disability case using compelling medical, psychological and vocational evidence--as appropriate.  Increasingly, I have witnessed that medical evidence alone will not win a disability hearing.  At the end of the day, the judge wants to know, "So you have (this or that disorder) - how does it prevent you from working?"  Where does your doctor state that you cannot lift more than 10 pounds or walk more than 100 feet without resting?  Medical + vocational evidence must be united to paint a picture of significantly restricted ability to function in the work place.

Here is the one area where I believe an experienced advocate or representative will enhance the case enormously and increase the odds of winning a disability award.

  


(256) 799-0297









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COMPLETING THE FUNCTION REPORT FOR SOCIAL SECURITY

Social Security analyzes a new claimant's ability to perform certain activities.  This helps them to decide whether the claimant is disabled according to their rules.  They use a form called "Function Report - Form SSA-3373-BK" or one very much like it.  Be careful how you answer the questions on this form.  Strive to be accurate but also descriptive.  Try to give a real picture of how your pain or other symptoms limit your daily activities--such as shopping, driving, doing housework, socializing, etc. Here are just a few of the questions on the Function Report, as samples of the type of information being collected from each applicant who files a new claim for benefits: Do you take care of anyone else such as a wife/husband, children, parents, friend, other?  ( If you do, and do not show that you have significant problems in doing so, Social Security may judge that you are quite able to perform other activity, like working). How often do you prepare food or meals? 

JUDGE JUDY TIRADES ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY

Judge Judy Sheindlin has added her two cents worth to the controversy about Social Security.  Judge Judy appeared on a Fox News program hosted by Megan Kelly and said she was tired of people getting Social Security disability because they were "alcoholics and drug addicts," adding to the popular myth that SSDI is "going broke" because of dead beat drug users who refuse to work.  Fox News did nothing to set the record straight. The truth is that by law individuals cannot qualify for SSI or SSDI benefits based on either alcohol or drug addiction/abuse. In 1996, Congress passed Public Law ( P.L. ) 104-121—which terminated benefits for Supplemental Security Income ( SSI ) and Disability Insurance ( DI ) beneficiaries whose primary impairment was drug addiction, alcoholism, or both. As a result of the 1996 legislation, those individuals became ineligible for benefits, effective January 1, 1997. Social Security will currently not award benefits to persons becau

TAKE A HARD LOOK AT SOCIAL SECURITY BEFORE YOU FILE!

Considering a Social Security disability claim?  Take a hard look at it before deciding. If you have a choice, you probably don't need to apply. Some things to consider: 1.  It will probably not be an easy or short process.  It will take about 4 months to get your initial decision and 70% of those are denials.  If you must appeal, expect a wait time of an additional 18 months after you file the appeal.  So, you may be looking at 2 years or more in many cases. 2.  You will need good medical evidence.  If you have little or no evidence from a doctor, it isn't likely you will ever be approved. 3.  You cannot apply for SSDI while you are working and earning at least $1,170 a month.  This work will disqualify you.  Many people don't realize they will have to stop working to apply for SSDI.  That's why we say, "If you have a choice, you probably don't need to apply."  If working is an option, it's the best option. 4.  The average SSDI benefit is arou