Skip to main content

DISABILITY 101 - FINAL EXAMINATION

Take this sample test.  If you fail the test, you may not want to represent yourself at a Social Security disability hearing.  The following are reasonable items of knowledge that should be expected at any hearing.  Answers are given following the test.  There are no trick questions.

1.  How many years are there in "past relevant work" history?
2.  How many sequential steps are there in evaluating an SSDI claim?
3.  Which exertional level requires the ability to stand or walk for only about two hours out of an eight-hour workday?
4.   True or False?  The inability to walk one block at a reasonable pace over a rough or uneven surface is an example of ineffective persistence and pace?
5.  Jobs at which exertional level usually requires the ability to react appropriately with co-workers, supervisors and the general public?
6.  If an individual is restricted to medium exertional level work, at what other levels can he also perform.
7.  You are alleging disability as of September 1, 2012; however, you've been working 15 hours a week, earning $12.50 per hour during that time period..  Does this work disqualify you for SSDI?  Why or why not?
8.  The vocational expert at your hearing testifies that he does not believe that rheumatoid arthritis in both knees qualifies as a disability?  Can he do that?
9.  The vocational expert testifies that you are unable to perform any of your past relevant work and that you cannot perform any other work in the national or regional economy.  Should you question the vocational expert following this testimony?
10.  You have previously worked as a construction laborer, a janitor, and parking garage attendant.  You worked longer than three years at each job.  Do you have skills that will transfer to other work in the national economy?

ANSWERS

1.  15 years
2.  5
3.  sedentary work
4.  False; it is an example of ineffective ambulation.
5.  all exertional levels
6.   In addition to medium, he can also perform light and sedentary work.
7.  No, because the wages are less than substantial gainful activity, which is $1,040 per month in 2013.
8.  The VE cannot give this testimony because he/she is not a medical doctor and is unqualified to offer a medical opinion.
9.   No.  It would be useless and perhaps counter productive to question the VE at that point.
10.  No.  Since all of this work is unskilled, no skills were obtained, thus there are no skills to transfer.

Allow 10 points for each correct answer.  (Remember, during the hearing you will be under considerable pressure, without nearly as much time for thinking about responses).

100 - 90     Exceptional
  70 - 80     Not bad
Below 70    Hire a representative today

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COMPLETING THE FUNCTION REPORT FOR SOCIAL SECURITY

Social Security analyzes a new claimant's ability to perform certain activities.  This helps them to decide whether the claimant is disabled according to their rules.  They use a form called "Function Report - Form SSA-3373-BK" or one very much like it.  Be careful how you answer the questions on this form.  Strive to be accurate but also descriptive.  Try to give a real picture of how your pain or other symptoms limit your daily activities--such as shopping, driving, doing housework, socializing, etc. Here are just a few of the questions on the Function Report, as samples of the type of information being collected from each applicant who files a new claim for benefits: Do you take care of anyone else such as a wife/husband, children, parents, friend, other?  ( If you do, and do not show that you have significant problems in doing so, Social Security may judge that you are quite able to perform other activity, like working). How often do you prepare food or meals? 

JUDGE JUDY TIRADES ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY

Judge Judy Sheindlin has added her two cents worth to the controversy about Social Security.  Judge Judy appeared on a Fox News program hosted by Megan Kelly and said she was tired of people getting Social Security disability because they were "alcoholics and drug addicts," adding to the popular myth that SSDI is "going broke" because of dead beat drug users who refuse to work.  Fox News did nothing to set the record straight. The truth is that by law individuals cannot qualify for SSI or SSDI benefits based on either alcohol or drug addiction/abuse. In 1996, Congress passed Public Law ( P.L. ) 104-121—which terminated benefits for Supplemental Security Income ( SSI ) and Disability Insurance ( DI ) beneficiaries whose primary impairment was drug addiction, alcoholism, or both. As a result of the 1996 legislation, those individuals became ineligible for benefits, effective January 1, 1997. Social Security will currently not award benefits to persons becau